Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:01:28 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Process Forking
Message-ID: <20011028180128.D23959@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <3BDC5FB5.5000108@Blueyonder.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3BDC5FB5.5000108@Blueyonder.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:42:45PM +0000, Jonathan Boler wrote:
>When I use "mozilla.exe &" to start mozilla or any other process, 
>another bash.exe process is spawned too. The documentation seems to 
>indicate that this extra bash process should terminate before the 
>mozilla process has finished.

If mozilla.exe is not a cygwin process then another cygwin process is
required to act as a "stub" when a non-cygwin process execed.  In this
case the "stub" is bash.exe.

>Is this correct or should there be an extra bash process for every 
>process that I start using the &?

Only for non-cygwin processes.

>If so then it is a bit annoying. I am running win2k.

Sigh.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

