Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 00:55:07 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: g++ 3.0.1 and g++ 2.95.3.5 Message-ID: <20011021005507.A29961@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <007801c159eb$8d5e7910$f365323f@amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007801c159eb$8d5e7910$f365323f@amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:47:54PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Piyush Kumar" >To: >Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:08 PM >Subject: g++ 3.0.1 and g++ 2.95.3.5 > >>I have a project of around (10k lines of C++ which uses lot of >>templates) I have right now 2.95.3-5 of gcc installed and today I >>compiled 3.0.1 on my machine. The output from g++ 3.0.1 is more than >>twice slower compared to 2.95.3-5 with same optimization settings!!! Is >>it because of y code or has some one else also seen this before! >> >>When is g++ 3.0.1 coming to the standard download from the mirror sites >>of cygwin(Thru setup.exe) > >Haven't you read any of the comments? Do I understand that you're >criticizing someone on the cygwin team both for the slowness of 3.0.1 >and also for not using it to replace the current mostly working >integrated system? Heh. Good point. I'm reminded of the very old joke. Two ladies sitting in a restaurant eating lunch. One makes a face and says "This food is terrible!" The other says "I know! And, such small portions!" cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/