Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3BCE009C.5090003@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:05:16 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 1.3.3 gcc problem References: <20011017232922.A10345@acc.umu.se> <3BCDFC43.A82FD70@punkpage.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Punk Page Peter wrote: >>Really. There sould be an #cygwin irc channel somewhere. Might decrease the amout of crap on >>this list. >> > > ...done. > Server: irc.xs4all.nl (or any other IRCnet-server, see > http://www.ircnet.com/servers.html for a list of servers) and join the > channel #cygwin Maybe I'm just a luddite -- I don't do the IRC thing or the IM thing -- but how does having an IRC channel help? If the idea is to "decrease the amount of crap on this list" -- where would the crap go? To the IRC channel? If so, then who is going to volunteer to sit there in the channel waiting for the crap? And (heaven forbid) if there is an actual, non-crap question asked in the channel, and someone (surprised by the unexpected non-crap) answers it -- that non-crap exchange is not archived in the mailing list archives...it's just *gone*. My point (and again, maybe I'm just a luddite 'cause I don't "get it"): how is this different -- from a logistical standpoint -- than just setting up a second, competing mailing list? Obviously nobody would support *that* -- so why *this*? (yeah yeah IRC real time blah blah no waiting biddy blah) --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/