Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:29:56 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Remove cygwin "History" from FAQ? Message-ID: <20011015212956.B12545@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4956-Mon15Oct2001225801+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> <3BCB7C21.1000509@punkpage.net> <7777-Mon15Oct2001235619+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> <3BCB85DF.4070504@punkpage.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BCB85DF.4070504@punkpage.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:57:03AM +0200, Punk Page Peter wrote: >>The release announcements provide the current history. These are indexed >>in the Project News page . > >Good. Only it's not news anymore, it's history. Perhaps the history >could/should have a 'news history'-section? Not interested. Sorry. (This is pretty much my guaranteed reaction to the word "perhaps") Also, since there was not a general hue and cry when I eliminated the history.html link, I don't think that there is much interest in an out-of-date, sketchy, unmaintained bunch of words whose most recent mention is the B20 release. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/