Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3BC40ED6.6090603@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:03:18 +0100 From: Bill Petheram Organization: TESL, HP Labs Bristol User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: GDB breaks in 1.3.3-2 on certain Win2000 machines -- something to try References: <30BDEE18E474D511BB0A00D0B7BB87AF09294A@camel.mha.ca> <20011009212908.A30223@redhat.com> <20011009230656.A15171@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean gdb doesn't work for me on Win2k. I am building a debug verion of gdb and 1.3.3-2. I hope to have more info late. bill 'cgf@redhat.com' wrote: > Just in case this got lost in my previous long-winded email, it would be > helpful if people could try the latest cygwin snapshot and report if the > problem has changed. > > It would be even more helpful if people could build a debugging version > of cygwin and report on the gdb stack trace, if it still fails. I > suspect that it *will* still fail as I didn't really do anything > substantial that would have fixed the problem. > > However, the stack trace should now be slightly more informative. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/