Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:37:27 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Binutils and GCC Message-ID: <20010918193727.A9164@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4.3.1.2.20010918171957.030f8ed8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <4935FB7B7B5AD4118D8B0090276ADB8F053FBA@pdc01.SoCSolutions. <4.3.1.2.20010918171957.030f8ed8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <4.3.1.2.20010918185417.030f8dd0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010918185417.030f8dd0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:57:52PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >Ah, good point Chris. I've apparently been skimming this email too >lightly lately. No debugging necessary for this one. Just patching! ;-) Your intent was correct, however. This requires debugging of the kind that involves looking at the sources and figuring out what's wrong and patching it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/