Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 19:05:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: Latest Install - Domain account - File permisssions Message-ID: <20010917190518.G10081@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <20010917181241.B10081@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BA62542.4060807@likai.net> <20010917184002.E10081@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BA629AC.5030201@likai.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BA629AC.5030201@likai.net>; from news@likai.net on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:49:48PM -0400 On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:49:48PM -0400, Li-Kai Liu wrote: > > > > > >Not really. It's the expected behaviour since domainless machines > >don't support the concept of settable primary groups as it's on > >U*X and in NT domains. Therefore all users have the fixed primary > >group of 513 = None on domainless machines. Unless you're using > >ntsec in Cygwin of course ;-) > > > actually, i am using ntsec. does ntsec have impact on what mkpasswd or > mkgroup is outputting? Nope. It can't. ntsec needs the passwd file which mkpasswd produces. It's a chicken-egg problem. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/