Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:51:54 -0400 From: Scott Brim To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: Mutt (on cygwin) and binary attachments Message-ID: <20010913125153.L1636@SBRIM-W2K> Mail-Followup-To: Scott Brim , Corinna Vinschen References: <20010913093731.E432@NBOF> <20010913131552.R1285@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BA0CE44.9080007@ece.gatech.edu> <20010913180551.C20079@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BA0DDBF.3080201@ece.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BA0DDBF.3080201@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:24:31PM -0400 On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 12:24:31PM -0400, Charles Wilson allegedly wrote: > >>It looks to me as if you just can't use the 'binmode.o/automode.o' magic > >>bullets. It seems that the real fix is to go thru the code, and put > >>O_BINARY or 'rb' in the correct places, and O_TEXT(?) or 'rt' in the > >>correct places. Yes? > >> > > > > Right. Are you volunteering? > > > If I must. However, I'll wait for an actual mutt user to step forward > before putting my oar in. Mutt users, hello? As a representative mutt user, it's a far better use of my time to spend 2 minutes making sure all relevant mounts and files are binmode, and use a pure binmode mutt. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/