Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3BA0DDBF.3080201@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:24:31 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: Mutt (on cygwin) and binary attachments References: <20010913093731.E432@NBOF> <20010913131552.R1285@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BA0CE44.9080007@ece.gatech.edu> <20010913180551.C20079@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:18:28AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:37:31AM +0000, Olaf Foellinger wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>here's a mail I've received that give hints about the attachment >>>>corruption of mutt. >>>> >>>> >>>Thanks for that hint. I have created a -3 version which returns >>>to the original binmode behaviour. >>> >> >>(disclaimer: I don't use mutt) >> >>Ya, but linking with binmode.o doesn't solve the other problem -- that >>of config files with DOS line endings. >> >>It looks to me as if you just can't use the 'binmode.o/automode.o' magic >>bullets. It seems that the real fix is to go thru the code, and put >>O_BINARY or 'rb' in the correct places, and O_TEXT(?) or 'rt' in the >>correct places. Yes? >> > > Right. Are you volunteering? If I must. However, I'll wait for an actual mutt user to step forward before putting my oar in. Mutt users, hello? --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/