Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:14:14 +0100 Message-ID: <3023-Sat08Sep2001151414+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 6.92 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: "Open bash shell here" shell extension In-Reply-To: <20010829145958.A6100@redhat.com> References: <001401c130b3$ca521220$2101a8c0@nomad> <20010829145958.A6100@redhat.com> On Wednesday 29 Aug 01, Christopher Faylor writes: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:55:28PM -0500, Gary R Van Sickle wrote: > >Could this info be added to the FAQ? Perhaps in a new section, something > >like "Getting the Most Out Of Cygwin"? Or, in response to the probable > >response, who do I send the patch to? > > cygwin@cygwin.com > > I would suggest that this is a documentation issue not a FAQ issue, though. I've seen the question of "bash shell here" come up a few times in the past, and I don't mind adding a new FAQ entry for it if there's no objection. Cheers, David (Cygwin FAQ maintainer) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/