Subject: Re: Up-to-date info on '-mno-cygwin' vs. Mingw32
From: Jesper Eskilson <[email-masked]>
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: 31 Aug 2001 08:50:56 +0200

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <[email-masked]> writes:

> The difference is in the build environment, not the result.  

According to the FAQ, support for the -mno-cygwin flag "has been weak
and flaky, [...] and maintenance of the option has *not* been a
priority in development", and the FAQ recommends that one uses a
separate MingW compiler set. Is this accurate?

/Jesper
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesper Eskilson                                         [email-masked]
Virtutech                                         http://www.virtutech.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/