Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:59:13 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: 1.3.2: Cygwin && UDP && O_NONBLOCK Message-ID: <20010816145913.Q17709@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE1CA302A@cpex3.channelpoint.com> <20010815095034.A6745@cygbert.vinschen.de> <030401c1264e$3ae5d550$93b849d5@uu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <030401c1264e$3ae5d550$93b849d5@uu.net>; from rgroesb@triple-it.com on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:23:14PM +0200 On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:23:14PM +0200, Roderick Groesbeek wrote: > From: "Corinna Vinschen" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:50 AM > Subject: Re: 1.3.2: Cygwin && UDP && O_NONBLOCK > > > Hello Corinna, > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 01:54:27PM -0600, Troy Noble wrote: > > > Roderick, > > > > > > Unless I misunderstood entirely, I think you've found a bug. > > > > Thanks for tracking that down. I changed the code to use your > > version 1 (fallback to winsock1) in case of nonblocking sockets. > > What is the correct way for me to obtain the new Cygwin DLL with > correct O_NONBLOCK behaviour? > > - Should I compile from source after an CVS update? That makes sense. You'll get the most fresh developer stuff including all new errors ;-) > - Should I take a snapshot? That's also ok. It's your choice. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/