Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <3B7B3843.7090701@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:04:35 -0400
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Collins <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
CC: cygwin@Cygwin.Com
Subject: Re: Automake 1.4l released -- show of hands from cygwin/automake	maintainers?
References: <3B7974C6.83934084@yahoo.com> <3B797B22.C06C71D9@yahoo.com>	<87bslip7hj.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <20010814195923.A28367@redhat.com>	<87wv46uoac.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <997839007.16944.3.camel@robertlinux>	<3B79DED8.3040807@ece.gatech.edu> <87snes4u2y.fsf@creche.redhat.com> 	<20010815221348.A18360@redhat.com> <997928838.23181.7.camel@lifelesswks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Collins wrote:


> An important thing to not:
> 
> AFAIK this is a testcase-only failure we're talking about. It *did not*
> affect me with cygwin, ntfs, ntsec and automake-HEAD (which had the
> chmod -R a-w under discussion.)
> 	
> Chuck - have you tried make distcheck with a trivial package? My wager
> is that that will work a-ok.	


No, I haven't.  When I get some time, I'll grab a goatbook example and 
try it.

However:

After building a CVS cygwin with Corinna's fix, Chris's change, and my 
modification (see other threads for details -- I will follow up in them 
with the specifics relative to each topic), I was able to build an 
automake-1.4l (no additional patches) that passed the three failing 
tests, lex3, pr9 and pr87.

On NTFS+ntsec.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/