Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 19:50:03 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: gordon_schumacher@maxtor.com Subject: Re: GCC *builds* now... but no install Message-ID: <20010808195003.C10114@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, gordon_schumacher@maxtor.com References: <68C4CF842BD2D411AC1600902740B6DA0111155B@mcoexc02.mlm.maxtor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <68C4CF842BD2D411AC1600902740B6DA0111155B@mcoexc02.mlm.maxtor.com>; from gordon_schumacher@maxtor.com on Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:35:42PM -0600 On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:35:42PM -0600, Schumacher, Gordon wrote: ># From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com] ># Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:07 AM ># To: cygwin@cygwin.com ># Subject: Re: GCC *builds* now... but no install ># ># Just as a wild guess it would sound like you have an old ># version of setup.exe. > >Well... the "setup.exe" on the download site doesn't work at all - it claims >that there are no packages to install. The "osetup.exe" displays version >numbers but no package names. Another wild guess -- the mailing list archives would probably be very instructive on the "nothing to install" scenario. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/