Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:58:36 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Signal handling in tight loops Message-ID: <20010807195836.B31913@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20010807233307.3FC3F1F9E2D@deborah.paradise.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010807233307.3FC3F1F9E2D@deborah.paradise.net.nz>; from ejrh@paradise.net.nz on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:33:07PM +0000 On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:33:07PM +0000, ejrh@paradise.net.nz wrote: >> Why don't you write a simple test case? > >Because I am at work where I don't have cygwin, or any compiler of any >form for that matter. Wow. You haven't been home for 24 hours? I hope you're getting overtime. >> This technique should be much more useful than inviting random opinions >> from a mailing list and it should be MUCH faster. > >I've only had one random opinion so far. :) Which sorta proves my point. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/