Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <3B5C58F6.7060403@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:03:50 -0400
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Coakley <gcoakley@mqsoftware.com>
CC: "'dominic@herard.net'" <dominic@herard.net>, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Text editors under Cygnus
References: <E1B42CFD544FD31193EE0000E87C5CE7E07F40@MAILSERVER2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Glen Coakley wrote:

> If you would like a lighter version (no X code): 
> 
> http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ntemacs.html
> (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs.html)
> 
> It doesn't run 'under' Cygnus but it does run on Windows and the FAQ lists
> where to get a small lisp module that will teach it to understand Cygwin
> mounts and paths.


I don't want to get into a "my-emacs-is-better" flamewar -- both NTEmacs 
and XEmacs are great packages.  However, I do want to clear up a 
misunderstanding:

Despite the name "XEmacs", the packages built for windows and for cygwin 
do NOT require an Xserver.  In fact, they don't contain the X code at 
all.  (You *can* build an X-based XEmacs for cygwin, but the official 
package is not built that way).

--Chuck




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

