Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010722165317.00a07610@bastion.datatask.com.au> X-Sender: ecognito1@foobar.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 16:59:27 +1000 To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: E Subject: Re: Did some porting for cygwin In-Reply-To: <3B5A3E85.9060503@ece.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id DAA29370 At 10:46 PM 21/07/2001 -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote: >Marcus Börger wrote: > >>+freetype.2.0.4 > >NO. this is included in the cygwin-xfree project. We shouldn't have two >different (conflicting?) versions of the same thing. > >--Chuck In that case, seeing as it appears to be useful for more than just X applications, would it be worthwhile moving it from the cygwin-xfree project to a package under the base cygwin distribution? Still only one version, but a wider audience. Freetype compiled with no actual source modifications once you'd frigged around with one of the config files a bit IIRC, so unless there are some cygwin-xfree patches to it that make is unusable otherwise, it shouldn't be too difficult. E. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/