Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:24:14 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: CYGWIN1.DLL
Message-ID: <20010717162414.A11147@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <995396435.30626.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <20010717201248.4654.qmail@web20010.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010717201248.4654.qmail@web20010.mail.yahoo.com>; from joshuadfranklin@yahoo.com on Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:12:48PM -0700

On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:12:48PM -0700, Joshua Franklin wrote:
>Just an idea, you might just recompile the DLL with a
>different registry entry and file name. That's the
>only compatibility problem with having two, no?

No.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

