Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <3B544D05.8020301@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:34:45 -0400
From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0
References: <ITDOMAIN002456UnHAa000000ec@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>	 <00e201c10e40$103e51e0$806410ac@local> <5.1.0.14.2.20010716152233.01e4a168@pop3.cris.com> <3B541B75.1FAD22E6@bestweb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James E. LaBarre wrote:

> If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right
> to complain when replies don't get sent to the list.


Regardless of anyone else's particular opinion on the narrow question: 
"should the cygwin mailing list software automatically insert <override> 
a Reply-To header"....

*I* can most certainly complain when I get off-list cygwin-related 
email.  Or when someone inappropriately takes a public discussion 
off-list (e.g. by not replying to the list).

--Chuck




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/