Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3B474080.F2CC123A@acris.co.uk> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 18:01:52 +0100 From: Julian Hall X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: error in pthreads implementation? References: <3B4713A7.55AE01CB@acris.co.uk> <004601c106fb$1fad17c0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Julian Hall" > To: > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 11:50 PM > Subject: error in pthreads implementation? > > > I'm currently working on getting gcj to work properly with cygwin, and > > am working on threading code; I seem to have found a bug in the > > implementation of pthreads.h. This is quite possibly gcc 3.0 > specific, > > but when the macro pthread_cleanup_push(...) is used, I get the > > following error from the compiler: > > Cancellation points haven't been implemented beyond a set of defines to > allow programs to compile... It's on my rather extensive todo list > though :]. I suspect that you may need them fully functional for java > :[. Unfortunately I don't have a timeframe for when I'll get time to > implement them, but I'm more than willing to proivde guidance if you are > interested in getting cancellation points extant. > > Rob The implementation that's there does seem to be fine for what's needed; only one at a time are used and never outside of each others scope. It seems to be working, anyway. Jules -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/