Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <00e801c0e941$429ebfe0$0731273f@ca.boeing.com>
From: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase@ix.netcom.com>
To: "cygwin" <cygwin@cygwin.com>, "\"Bernd Walther\"" <Bernd.Walther@ids.de>
References: <010c01c0e91e$6237d210$0d32a8c0@ids.de> <20010530130718.D19066@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gawk Version
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:46:16 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Let's talk nice to Chris for a while, it looks like he's considering moving
to M$. :}b

The long answer is that no one has updated that tarball since it was
provided.  Are you offering to maintain gawk for Cygwin?
--
Mac :})
Give a hobbit a fish and he'll eat fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he'll eat fish for an age.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:07
Subject: Re: gawk Version

> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Bernd Walther wrote:
> >is there any reason,
> >that there is in the actual cygwin distribution
> >a gawk version 3.0.4  instead of the version  3.0.6,
> >which will be unchanged at gnu.org since Summer last year ?
>
> Yes.



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

