Subject: Re: Updated setup.exe to 2.55 on sources.redhat.com (fixes the problem?)
From: Christopher Faylor <[email-masked]>
To: Norberto Alfredo Bensa <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 16:52:42 -0400

Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports:  http://cygwin.com/ .

If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project web page.

For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the
cygwin mailing list.  I've also Cc'ed this reply there.

On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 12:19:58AM -0300, Norberto Alfredo Bensa wrote:
>hmmmm, I think I made a mistake. My setup.ini was corrupt, i. e. it wasn't a
>text file. I had been having problems on W2K: bash didn't start saying it
>cannot load 'cygwin1.dll'. I have deleted setup.ini and then I did a new
>installation, now it works again...
>
>Best regards,
>Norberto
>
>PS: I'm using setup 2.57, althrough setup.ini claims that setup version is
>2.54 ...
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <[email-masked]>
>To: "Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <[email-masked]>
>Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 00:14
>Subject: Re: Updated setup.exe to 2.55 on sources.redhat.com (fixes the
>problem?)
>
>
>> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:48:55PM -0300, Norberto Alfredo Bensa wrote:
>> >Weird but 2.55 solves my problem with random characters in directory
>> >names...
>>
>> Gahhhhhhhhhh!!!!
>>
>> Ok.  You know what else I did?  I compiled setup.exe with gcc 2.95.3.
>>
>> I had been using the latest gcc from gcc.gnu.org.  Maybe that's the
>> difference.
>>
>> Does this "new" version solve anyone else's problems?
>>
>> cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple