Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:00:32 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.3.2, w32api-20010520 Message-ID: <20010522160031.C19354@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <200105211539.f4LFdxw05706@rtl.cygnus.com> <000301c0e2d7$57a48660$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> <20010522122943.A18865@redhat.com> <3B0AB98B.4040101@mow.siemens.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3B0AB98B.4040101@mow.siemens.ru>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:10:03PM +0400 On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:10:03PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:53:28PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: >> >>>This release fixed a problem we had with zsh tests that were using pty. >>>Thank you. >>> >> >>Huh. Interesting. Was this the problem with O_NOCTTY? I am surprised >>that this would actually work correctly. >> > > >No. O_NOCTTY was internally fixed by not using it on Cygwin :-) Oh. Ok. I still plan on investigating this behavior at some point. It would be interesting to see if there was any difference in behavior if you reinstated the O_NOCTTY test because there is now code in cygwin that makes an attempt to do the right thing although I'm not sure that it is 100% correct. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple