Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 00:04:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?
Message-ID: <20010501000437.C5077@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010430105401.00eb8220@san-francisco.beasys.com> <3AEE2E6F.1044C4C6@ece.gatech.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3AEE2E6F.1044C4C6@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:33:03PM -0400

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:33:03PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>>Each time I install, something might be fixed but something else
>>breaks.  For instance C-c - using C-c in cygwin is completely
>>fundamental to its usability and yet it has been fairly broken in the
>>last two versions I have installed (1.1.8-2 and 1.3.1);
>
>You are unfortunately correct about the ^C issue.  However, (and this
>is the really strange thing) it got fixed in the snapshots *prior* to
>1.3.1 IIRC, but then broke AGAIN at 1.3.1...but is NOW fixed (again) in
>the snapshots.  I think.  :-P

WHAT ^C issue?  What are we talking about?????

The only issue I'm aware of is being unable to stop a cygwin process if
all of its standard input/output has been redirected.  That was fixed
a couple of days ago but it was hardly a new problem.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

