Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:37:48 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question Message-ID: <20010425083748.E23753@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from karlm30@hotmail.com on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0700 On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Karl M wrote: > Hi All... > > I just turned on 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' and set up my file protections to make > sshd happy (running as a srvany service on win2k sp1). > > myname@MACHINENAME ~ > $ ps -aef > UID PID PPID TTY STIME COMMAND > system 652 1 0 15:39:34 /usr/sbin/sshd > system 800 1 -1 15:39:39 /usr/sbin/sshd > myname 1272 1 1 15:41:23 /usr/bin/bash > myname 1104 1272 1 15:41:30 /usr/bin/ps > > When I rebooted my machine and did a ps, I saw an extra sshd process that I > did not see before. ssh/sshd appear to work fine. Why is there an extra sshd > process...is it normal...does anyone else have the same thing happen? It's normal. It's the parent sshd which has been started by SRVANY and which has forked the daemon. It's not needed anymore but for some reason SRVANY blocks that the process can exit. if you stop the service (`net stop sshd') you will see that SRVANY and the first sshd process have exited but the daemon itself remains and is fully funtional. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple