Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Support in gcc for 586
References: <200104221604.JAA10695@mail7.bigmailbox.com>
	<20010422123312.A24385@redhat.com> <m3n198n8vv.fsf@master.athome>
	<20010422183507.A25103@redhat.com> <m31yqkkstp.fsf@master.athome>
From: Andrew Markebo <flognat@flognat.myip.org>
Date: 23 Apr 2001 19:39:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <m31yqkkstp.fsf@master.athome>
Message-ID: <m3elujikgv.fsf@master.athome>
Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

/ Andrew Markebo <flognat@flognat.myip.org> wrote:
| [...]
| Sorry, I assumed that the subdir in /usr/lib/gcc-lib indicated the
| _target_ that gcc was built _for_. (like if you built a cross-compiler
| for m68k on a 686, where should it be placed?)
| 
| I can test it on an old 586 later on today, and back off.. 

Yep, installed latest cygwin on an old 586, and gcc seemed to work,
sorry for threading on areas I don't know about.

        /Andy

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple