Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Support in gcc for 586
References: <200104221604.JAA10695@mail7.bigmailbox.com>
	<20010422123312.A24385@redhat.com> <m3n198n8vv.fsf@master.athome>
	<20010422183507.A25103@redhat.com>
From: Andrew Markebo <flognat@flognat.myip.org>
Date: 23 Apr 2001 08:56:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20010422183507.A25103@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <m31yqkkstp.fsf@master.athome>
Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

/ Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
| [...]
| >
| >Humm..  I just checked my gcc.
| >
| >flognat@CUTIE2K /usr/lib/gcc-lib $ gcc --version 2.95.3-2
| >flognat@CUTIE2K /usr/lib/gcc-lib $ ls /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ i686-pc-cygwin
| >
| >Smells like 686 compiled??
| 
| Did you actually TRY THIS?

Sorry, I assumed that the subdir in /usr/lib/gcc-lib indicated the
_target_ that gcc was built _for_. (like if you built a cross-compiler
for m68k on a 686, where should it be placed?)

I can test it on an old 586 later on today, and back off.. 

        /Andy

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple