Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <002601c0cba0$b0bc24e0$5b1efd9d@winbox>
Reply-To: "Nicolay Giraldo" <ngiraldo@virtualis.com>
From: "Nicolay Giraldo" <ni-giral@uniandes.edu.co>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Support in gcc for 586
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:52:07 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>Did you actually TRY THIS?
>
>Cygwin was built with this compiler.  I haven't seen anyone complaining
>that Cygwin didn't operate on a "Pentium MMX".
>
>If you are actually having some sort of problem, then post it here.
>Otherwise, it appears that you are making incorrect assumptions about
>the way that gcc operates.
>


Yes, it is another kind of problem.
I have just 4 days with cygwin, so please forgive me.

I'm running postgresql, so I have to use cygwin 1.1.7 (thats what 
this list's archives says and works for now)

Yesterday I downloaded gcc, and it didn't worked, so I though it has
something to do with the lib/686 files, cause the errors were 
noticed there.

But the problem is the last gcc is linked against the last cygwin,
now I'm using an older gcc and it compiles things right.

Thanks for your patience.

Nicolay


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple