Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:27:52 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: permissioning on samba-mounted drive
Message-ID: <20010421132752.C4033@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <85256A33.0056EF34.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com> <3ADF0E22.42A7F6D5@yahoo.com> <20010419184743.M12557@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20010420121234.C23950@redhat.com> <20010420192057.H15499@cygbert.vinschen.de> <87k84ezip4.fsf@grannyogg.localnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <87k84ezip4.fsf@grannyogg.localnet>; from adrianp@powertech.no on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:49:11AM +0200

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:49:11AM +0200, Adrian Phillips wrote:
>>>>>> "Corinna" == Corinna Vinschen <cygwin@cygwin.com> writes:
>    >> Have you looked at the new version of Samba, Corinna?  They've
>    >> apparently made some improvements in this regard.
>
>    Corinna> Not yet. I heard rumours but I was under the impression
>    Corinna> that ACLs are only supported fully if the server system
>    Corinna> supports them as well (as Solaris).
>
>Correct, and the "new" version is still alpha so I don't believe many
>people will be overly interested in running it yet (although of course
>it would be interesting to see how it works with Cygwin),

I just scanned the press release page for Samba 2.2.0.  The word "alpha"
does not show up anywhere:

http://us1.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba2.2.press.html

I'm not sure what your point is anyway.  I didn't say "If everyone drops
the older version and uses the newer then all problems will be magically
solved."  I was wondering if the new version solved any problems, which
is something that we need to know.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple