Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:31:37 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib
Message-ID: <20010417173137.B29054@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0104171712130.23663-100000@frontal.ibb.gatech.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0104171712130.23663-100000@frontal.ibb.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:19:46PM -0400

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:19:46PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Does anybody know why newlib doesn't implement a trival vfscanf() wrapper
>around __svfscanf() ?

This is a question for the newlib@sources.redhat.com mailing list but I
suspect that the answer is probably "Because no one has gotten around to it".

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple