Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:43:18 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: sh-utils Message-ID: <20010416164318.A20170@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4.3.1.2.20010416161339.02150ce8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <15613584769.20010417003633@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <15613584769.20010417003633@FreeBSD.org>; from demon@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:36:33AM +0400 On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:36:33AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >Hello Inc), > >Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 12:13:56 AM, you wrote: > >LHRPI> At 04:09 PM 4/16/2001, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>>Hello! >>> >>>Why sh-utils-2.0-{1,2}.tar.gz does not contain >>>su.exe? > > > >LHRPI> It doesn't work. > > >But when I used cygwin this summer (I don't remember version numbers) >su binary *was* in sh-utils. >Whats happened? I removed it because it doesn't work? cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple