Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:01:59 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: G++ guru's please comment - Re: FW: pthread_create problem in Cygwin 1.1.8-2] Message-ID: <20010410160159.B19805@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20010409104706.A29382@redhat.com> <01ff01c0c140$73537190$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <01ff01c0c140$73537190$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:10AM +1000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:10AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> This is one of those situations where it looks like gcc can't be >> released until a version of cygwin is released with the requisite >> functionality. > >What's missing? I have a list of over 20 functions in front of me that >I've just coded stubs for... What I was referring to is that if we release a version of gcc which relies on functions available only in cygwin snapshots that's clearly a problem. I don't know specifically what pthread functionality gcc uses, however. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple