Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 22:17:59 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: pilot-link and cygwin Message-ID: <20010406221759.A14994@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20010406212530.B26407@monster.master-link.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010406212530.B26407@monster.master-link.org>; from linguist-pilot@rich-paul.net on Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:25:30PM -0400 On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:25:30PM -0400, linguist-pilot@rich-paul.net wrote: >Just wanted to let you guys know that there appears to be an alternate >way to build pilot-link for windblows ... if you're forced to use >windblows :( > >cygwin B1? seems to compile it just find, if you do the following: No idea what Cygwin B1? might be. This sounds like you're advocating using three or four year old software. That can't be very useful. I don't think that advice that people use really old software is generally a good idea. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple