Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <3AC50129.712959EC@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:56:57 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin@cygwin.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin
References: <044601c0b929$91291400$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20010330110640.B12883@redhat.com> <3AC4C0C3.6C3DD7F9@yahoo.com> <20010330133443.A29516@redhat.com> <3AC4E5F9.E84767B8@yahoo.com> <20010330153956.C30299@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> The bottom line is that, IMO, if you have to do research to figure out
> the right option to use, then it really doesn't matter all that much
> what the option is called.  Given this, IMO, the one thing that does
> make sense, is to stick with what has historically been used.  For this
> reason, I think that nuking -mno-cygwin is apt to cause more confusion
> than it saves.
> 

I agree with this.  It is one of the reasons I haven't lobbied for a
change.

> cgf
> 
> P.S. Btw, -mcygwin is a valid switch.
> 

I knew this too.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple