Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3ABF4085.EA50507A@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:13:41 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3-1 available for testing -- question for Earnie References: <20010324210440.A2203@redhat.com> <20010325022107.17525.qmail@web6403.mail.yahoo.com> <20010324213808.A28123@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: > >> Sorry. It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly. Doesn't it > >> make sense to put the mingw headers there? Are the headers generic > >> enough that this doesn't matter? > > > >The g++ headers in cygwin are *identical* to the ones that gcc make install put > >in my mingw package. > > How have you verified that? Did you actually diff the directories? > > Regardless, I guess I have to defer to Earnie as to whether we should use the > /usr/include/g++-3 directory or the /usr/include/mingw/g++-3 directory. > I can't think of any reason for MinGW specific changes to g++-3 headers but for consistency duplicate headers would be what I would do. It would appear to the end user that something was amiss otherwise. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple