Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:38:08 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.3-1 available for testing -- question for Earnie Message-ID: <20010324213808.A28123@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin References: <20010324210440.A2203@redhat.com> <20010325022107.17525.qmail@web6403.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010325022107.17525.qmail@web6403.mail.yahoo.com>; from danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200 On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: >> Sorry. It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly. Doesn't it >> make sense to put the mingw headers there? Are the headers generic >> enough that this doesn't matter? > >The g++ headers in cygwin are *identical* to the ones that gcc make install put >in my mingw package. How have you verified that? Did you actually diff the directories? Regardless, I guess I have to defer to Earnie as to whether we should use the /usr/include/g++-3 directory or the /usr/include/mingw/g++-3 directory. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple