Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <001101c0b14c$82ade840$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4>
From: "Tim Prince" <tprince@computer.org>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <B7536E2DB26AD211A42500104BB49C72F604D9@manbarapp1.intgame.com> <008701c0b081$1d5085a0$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4> <018901c0b0bb$0e2d8110$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <006b01c0b0f6$f83a2f20$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4> <20010320091947.I32706@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 06:46:02 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you had any authority to get
those patches accepted.  I was contrasting the gcc-2.95.3 stance of no
current cygwin support, and the 3.0 stance of accepting David's patches
when they were perhaps important to other OS.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.


> On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:33:35PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
> >Fortunately, the mainline gcc-3.0 snapshots seem much more in favor
of
> >cygwin, but I see that none of the last 3 of David Billingsworth's
> >patches to make the testsuite go on cygwin have been included in the
> >distribution as of today.
>
> I've been pretty active in accepting David's patches but I can't
approve
> the ones that are outside of my area of responsibility, unfortunately.
>
> I have a couple of patches that I need to get to but they only deal
with
> reducing the number of warnings produced by the compilation of gcc.
They
> shouldn't impact the test suite.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple