Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:18:32 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" Subject: Re: FW: gcc-2.95.3 is released. Message-ID: <20010319131832.A19287@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" References: <20010319125625.F18807@redhat.com> <20010319130606.G18807@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010319130606.G18807@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:06:06PM -0500 On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:06:06PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:56:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:37:57AM -0800, Blythe.Stephen wrote: >>>Does anyone know if this includes the cygwin patches? There is no mention >>>of it on the announcement page, or of cygwin in the build status page. >> >>AFAIK, it does not include any patches that I got from Mumit or any of >>my work with -mno-cygwin. > >Actually, you can remove the AFAIK above. I've applied the patches that >upgrade from gcc 2.95.2 to gcc 2.95.3 with no problem so the patches ^ cygwin >were definitely not included. ...not my day for clarity. It's probably the walking pneumonia... cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple