Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:53:11 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin , Chris Faylor Subject: Re: fetchmail/procmail/jed -- cygwin binaries available? Message-ID: <20010316145311.B20900@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin , Chris Faylor References: <20010314152310.A71253@mandy.rockingd.calgary.ab.ca> <20010315111917D.rsato@ccs.co.jp> <20010315125009.B12630@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20010316105225S.rsato@ccs.co.jp> <20010316093333.D19468@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3AB21626.6FB1FBC@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AB21626.6FB1FBC@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:33:26AM -0500 On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:33:26AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > In theory that should be no problem. As a first hack simply > > uncomment these calls or ignore the return value. If maildrop > > uses strict chmod settings, open them up. If maildrop then works > > without complaining we could care to rearranging security again. > > I have written a function for OpenSSH which checks if security > > makes sense, dependent of the used file system and if ntea/ntsec > > are on or off. We could recycle that functionality as desired. > > > > Or, should this become an official Cygwin specific API? Then you > wouldn't have to recycle, it would simply be the way you do it. Good point. Chris? Do you think that makes sense? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple