Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
From: "Mark Allan Young" <myoung@intrinsic.com>
To: "Cygwin" <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: CVS (v1.11) performance on Cygwin 1.1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:47:36 -0800
Message-ID: <NDEILJKIAMKIMKIDIGNCGEICCKAA.myoung@intrinsic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

We have a linux server running CVS 1.10.7.

After upgrading our cygwin distributions, we've noticed that
the cvs performance has gone complete down the tubes.

Using a 1.10.8 version of CVS seems to do much better.

Doing a "cvs co" of our source tree, comprised of 8087 files,
(127Mb), we see the time go from about 1 minute to four minutes.

We're running Windows2000 SP1+hotfix.

we're looking at upgrading our linux server, but I was curious
if anyone else has run into similar performance problems.

thanks.

...myoung

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple