Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:26:30 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mingw32 build? Message-ID: <20010314212630.A29969@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3AB017B2.2D87FCED@ece.gatech.edu> <3AAFB3E6.5162.1023538@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3AAFB3E6.5162.1023538@localhost>; from pgarceau@qwest.net on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 06:09:42PM -0800 On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 06:09:42PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote: >For Cygwin, and I am assuming that Chris F. will gently correct me on >this, Mingw is basically a "bonus", and it is supported only minimally >for use in a Cygwin environment. For full power Mingw builds, the >Mingw distribution is your very best bet. Cygwin environment allows >mingw-gcc builds, it does not focus on them. Thus the reason for the >-mno-cygwin switch. What?????!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are absolutely correct!!!!! How about if I ungently agree? cgf :-) -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple