Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 23:33:19 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cross compiler for Cygwin
Message-ID: <20010309233319.A8993@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20010309225502.A3200@redhat.com> <Pine.HPP.3.96.1010309222131.14734C-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1010309222131.14734C-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:26:35PM -0600

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:26:35PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote:
>That's one great thing about the one-tree build that RedHat/Cygnus uses,
>no hassle builds for a myriad a of host-target combos. And that's why
>embedded system developers pay for commercial support, the cost of which
>may seem atrocious when you first see it, but you soon find out that it's 
>well worth it.

I hope someday we can truly make gcc.gnu.org/sources.redhat.com "one tree".
It's a little cumbersome right now with part of the tree on gcc.gnu.org:/cvs/gcc
and part on sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src/src

I do have a unified cvs repository that seems to work at "/cvs/uberbaum"
on sources.redhat.com.  It seems to work ok but it is not fully functional
as far as merging the different modules from gdb, gcc, binutils, etc.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

