Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <3AA8D8B1.A873899@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 08:20:49 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin@cygwin.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralf Fassel <ralf@akutech.de>
CC: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: different behaviour of bash and sh
References: <15015.59568.965521.675165@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
		<3AA8CFB3.4B515116@yahoo.com> <15016.54025.593153.95134@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ralf Fassel wrote:
> 
> * Earnie Boyd
> | In the Cygwin release
> |
> | sh != bash
> | sh == ash
> 
> And `ash' is supposed to return 0 for $? of `false'?
> 

I wasn't saying ash does or doesn't have a bug; I was pointing your
fallacy especially to the bash-bugs list.  If you feel that ash is
incorrect then please, download the source, fix it, submit a patch to
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com for consideration.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple