Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:06:24 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: Cygwin Subject: Re: New symlinks. Message-ID: <20010228110624.B2327@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: Cygwin References: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E21C@IIS000> <20010228135244.I8464@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010228135244.I8464@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:52:44PM +0100 On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:52:44PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> another icon ;^). Don't underestimate people using Windows; most of them are >> not idiots and are used to Windows idiosyncrasisms, so when using cygwin >> they can adapt :-) > >I wonder... > >*restrain sarcasm* > >...anyway, you may be right here ;-) I HEARTILY disagree with this. We have repeatedly see the confusion of people on this mailing list on all matter of subjects. I have no reason to assume that having files with a .lnk extension will be any different -- especially since Microsoft goes out of its way to hide the extension itself. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple