Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <3A9584E3.2047D8D5@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:30:11 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin@cygwin.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
CC: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT]: Important change to symbolic linkfunctionali ty
References: <3A957332.FD98DFF6@ece.gatech.edu>
	 <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E210@IIS000>
	 <20010222184404.S908@cygbert.vinschen.de>
	 <3A955952.6FF234D4@ece.gatech.edu>
	 <20010222140454.F13561@redhat.com>
	 <3A957332.FD98DFF6@ece.gatech.edu> <4.3.1.2.20010222155316.02f226c8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> 
> At 03:53 PM 2/22/2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > I just thought of another problem though -- if I put together a distro
> > > tarball that contains symlinks, the dos paths will match MY system, and
> > > not the user's system.  Unless part of the postinstall script is to run
> > > fix-symlinks on the symlinks included in the installed package...
> >
> >No. Obviously not. Since Cygwin tar reads and saves the POSIX path
> >in the tarball, it is absolutely correctly recreated when unpacked
> >on the target system even when the links are absolute links, say
> >/usr/include/foo or alike.
> 
> Wait, but you're just talking about the POSIX path.  I think Chuck was
> referring to the Windows paths, right Chuck?
> 

You misunderstand Corinna.  She is saying that the *.lnk files wouldn't
be in the tarball only the attribute of the links and the *.lnk file
would be recreated when extracting it from the tarball.  The *.lnk file
itself would not be extracted but recreated.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

