Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:40:10 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin and GPL (again) Message-ID: <20010215124010.D4397@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20010214232946.A28167@redhat.com> <003701c0970a$cd6fd7a0$17bbca97@Arda> <20010215000001.A28498@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from jojo@virtutech.se on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:27:27AM +0100 On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:27:27AM +0100, Jesper Eskilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: > >> The problem is that this mailing list is becoming increasingly less >> interesting to me personally. It was actually stimulating to see people >> discussing how to speed up stat(). > >But isn't that a topic for the cygwin-developers list? Anything cygwin-related is appropriate here. If we start seeing a lot of internals discussion, I might consider opening up cygwin-developers after I regain consciousness. I really really do not want to open up cygwin-developers to people who think that it is a personal pipeline for getting their questions answered. I regularly get indignant queries from people who insist that their questions are appropriate because they are interested in porting their application to cygwin and have some questions about internals. I would rather keep cygwin-developers as a low-volume list populated with knowledgeable people. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple