Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <3A8AF452.A03C8F1B@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:10:42 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
CC: "Javorcik, William (ITG)" <William_Javorcik@ml.com>,
        "'Earnie Boyd'" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: 1.1.8: du reports incorrect sizes
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010214154957.00a8b7f0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" wrote:
> 
> I think that was Earnie's point.  The problem could be caused by the new
> du or the new DLL.  If you would try the old du running against the new
> DLL, this would answer the question of where the problem lies...

I think the confusion here is about the new packaging system.  Packages
such as "fileutils" are now decoupled from the core cygwin.  So, on Jan
31, 2001, cygwin-1.1.8-2 replaced cygwin-1.1.7 as the official core
cygwin package.  On Dec 27, 2000, cygwin-1.1.7 in turn replaced
cygwin-1.1.6 as the official cygwin core package.

Completely asynchronous to this, however, fileutils-4.0-2 replaced
fileutils<no explicit version, based on 3.12> as the official fileutils
binary package for the cygwin platform on Dec 18, 2000.

So, it means very little to say "the fileutils from cygwin-1.1.8".  All
that says is "I updated both cygwin-core and fileutils at some point
after Jan 31, 2001."  The question Earnie want answered is:

Did the fileutils-3.12 ---> 4.0-2 change on Dec 18, 2000 cause  the
problem, or did the cygwin-core change on Dec 27, 2000 or Jan 31, 2001,
or ... cause the problem?

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple