Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <3A8955E0.1C8E6544@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:42:24 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Malcolm Boekhoff <Malcolm.Boekhoff@actfs.co.uk>
CC: Cygwin News Group <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: chmod and ntsec
References: <852569F1.005AA916.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com> <004901c095a5$cb7419e0$275c100a@actfs.co.uk> <3A89409C.ED192DEA@yahoo.com> <007101c095d1$80844730$275c100a@actfs.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
> 
> So is the definitive, expert answer to use "ntsec" or "ntsec ntea"?
> 

The ntsec flag overrides the ntea flag IIRC.  There is no reason to use
the ntea flag if you use the ntsec flag.  The ntea flag, IMO, should be
removed in the next release as it can cause more consequence than good.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple