Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <024401c09183$267096b0$3c5350d8@bluesguitar.org>
From: "Matthew Smith" <matts@bluesguitar.org>
To: "Cygwin" <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
References: <20010207224617.A22348@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ksh93?
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:56:43 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

I'm still working on it.  I sort of lost interest though, now that zsh runs
so smoothly under cygwin (no more status access violations, yay!).
    The slashdot piece was interesting, but I had to disagree with a number
of his points.  Especially the bits about uwin versus cygwin.  Uwin has lots
of clever ideas, but it's executed very poorly.  It's been extremely
unstable in my experience.  I downloaded version 2.25 of it around a week
ago to see if it had improved, and promptly trashed it.  Cygwin all the way,
baby.

cheers,
-Matt Smith


> I just read David Korn's question and answer session on SlashDot and found
> out that ksh93 is now open-sourced.
>
> I was wondering if anyone had built this on Cygwin.
>
> Anyone?
>
> cgf
>



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

