Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:18:43 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Setup loads gcc-2.95.2-6 over gcc 2.95.2-7 (was Re: libuser32.a left out of latest Cygwin distro?) Message-ID: <20010206161843.D9738@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010206152845.00b08470@irispavp.igb.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20010206152845.00b08470@irispavp.igb.umontreal.ca>; from bleau@igb.umontreal.ca on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:53:25PM -0500 On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:53:25PM -0500, Andre Bleau wrote: >Setup 2.29 always proposes to load gcc 2.95.2-6, even if you have gcc >2.95.2-7 installed. This bug is independent of the mirror used (I tried 6 >or 7 different mirrors). Sigh. That's because I made gcc 2.95.2-7 a test release despite the fact that I said that it wasn't. Sorry about that. Given the problems that people are reporting with this, I think I'll keep the test designation on 2.95.2-7 for a while. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple